If the error occurs during system startup, restart your computer, and press F8 at the character-mode menu that displays the operating system choices. This option is most effective when only one driver or service is added at a time.
Resolving an antivirus software problem : Disable the program and confirm that this resolves the error. If it does, contact the manufacturer of the program about a possible update. You must restart the system before the disk scan begins on a system partition. Finally, check the System Log in Event Viewer for additional error messages that might help pinpoint the device or driver that is causing the error. Disabling memory caching of the BIOS might also resolve it.
We understand that, you are trying to help OP Original Poster. However, copy - pasting contents from already published article without giving any reference is not a good practice, that will be considered as Plagiarism.
The above contents are taken directly from following article and there is no reference given! Regards, Santosh I do not represent the organisation I work for, all the opinions expressed here are my own.
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I suspect that is the problem with the horrid RDP performance. This is a display driver issue which is resolved in ESX i 4. So, update. After 4. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? I think you just need to uncheck the appropriate box.
Thanks, that was helpful with the password issue. I would still like to see about getting IP6 deselected and QoS deselected as well, but I may have to script that. To continue this discussion, please ask a new question. Which of the following retains the information it's storing when the system power is turned off? Submit ». Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks.
That would be Vmware ESX. That would save me at a Hardware level, but not at an OS level unless you know something I don't which is possible. I'm no esx guru If I'm missing something at the esx level please enlighten me. Sure, you can use snapshots prior to maintenance but even that can cause an interruption in service.
You're not missing anything. Some customers require the ability to fail resources over to do operating system maintenance. My current gig has the same requirements. You can't facilitate that with anything VMware offers. Thank you. If you already have monthly maintenance windows for patching, those maintenance windows must have been agreed with the business. That being the case you shouldn't expect to have people bitching about services being unavailable - they have agreed to the services being unavailable not everything can be clustered.
As has already been suggested, the actual outage time to resurrect a VM that was running on a failed Vmware ESX host is typically as long as is required to boot the server. I reckon I can patch and restart a single VM print server in about the same time I can failover and bring back on the line the cluster group.
Yes if windows died on the VM that might cause a longer downtime, but I actually find single VMs are less problematic than clustered print servers, plus we have NetApp snapshots. VMs boot fast. Having fought and lost about this very same issue, my advice is to do whatever you can to NOT virtualize this, or NOT cluster it. This I can get behind. Mainly not cluster it in a virtual environment. In our setup, we have no snapshots, no vmotion, no HA, etc.
It's completely worthless and makes administration insanely difficult at times. I would argue that a cluster print server is more likely to have stability issues and be down for unplaned maintaince more often than a virtual stand-alone print server. This of course is unless your running all inbox drivers. I moved all of our clustered print servers to standalone VMs and we have had much much lower unplanned downtime.
I would say If you really needed that level you could keep a cold standby server. It would be up and ready to take over services in a few minutes. Its not list a Failover cluster is non-imapcting to the client. Very good points. I will bring these comments up to the rest of the team. Beakerman wrote: Very good points. Although I beleive the clustered print server remains largely unchanged.
The issue wasn't with the cluster service itself its has to do with the fact that the printing system was designed with clustering in mind. If I was going to do it again I would limit the number of 3rd party drivers installed with 3rd party print processors.
I don't think it did much for print services. You could run a sceduled task to use printbrm to sync your two print servers configs as often as you want. It takes me about 3 hours to restore from scratch using printbrm so a hot standby already in sync would be much faster if you need better reponse time. Highly interesting idea, combine that with a CNAME and you could effectively do clustering without the overhead. Sorry for the late reply I've been busy with some other fires.
I just spent some time working with Microsoft on some issues with printbrm namely the largely undocumented brmconfig. Which support even admitted to me that it's got its own issues. I will say it does have some awesome potential when it comes to migrating a large number of queues. It actually discovered some "issues" with some the current print queues. Namely print processors. You are absolutely correct on the reference to 3rd party PPs and PMs. Actually it is my goal to primarily use the UPD and it's associated PP when required for all print queues with the exception of 2 a plotter, and a label printer which without the PPs doesn't work correctly.
0コメント